NIST Site Search
Custom Search
[Official NIST.GOV TIME]
Product Research

Advertise on this site
Spear Phishing – Casting a Narrow Net
If you haven't heard of the term “Spear Phishing” you probably don't work for the Department of Defense (DoD). All DoD employees and contractors (Army, Navy, Air Force, Marines, etc.) are now required to complete spear phishing training. What is it and why should you care?No Longer Supported
Spear Phishing is simply as the title of this article indicates, it is the same as phishing but focused on a much smaller audience. A small net to catch just a few, or one, big fish. Often the attack is tailored to a particular individual, office or company. The bait is customized with information familiar, and specific, to the target. Often the attack takes on characteristics of a traditional con. The attacker uses information about you or your company to lower your guard and defeat any skepticism you may have that the email you just received is a scam. The information may be easily obtainable from the Internet, a phone book, or perhaps from a call to the office secretary. Social engineering is often a part of a good spear phishing attack. There is also some sort of bait to convince you that the message isn't just legitimate spam (because even if the sender of the email knows you that doesn't mean you want to open their email).

An attacker may use jargon used by the individual's business or line of work. They may express familiarity with other people within the company and mention them by name. Sometimes they'll reference procedures or forms used by the targets agency. Each of us may think we would never fall for this, but think of the people you work with. Given a personally addressed email that referenced a company specific product or service how many would open an attached file? Especially a MS Word or Excel file (both of which have had exploits recently that can be used to compromise a computer). Probably a large percentage of your coworkers would fall for this.

The goal of a spear phishing attack is often to obtain very specific information. It could be financial information, insider contract information, passwords, sensitive employee data, etc. (Studies show that a large percentage of users are still all too willing to give out their password to someone they don' know that claims to work for the IT department.) If they still fall for that they'll fall for most anything. (See References and Recommendations below)

Scenario 1:
Motivation: Wreak Havoc at a government office
Method: Combined social engineering / spear phishing attack
Details: Attacker finds an employee contact page on the Internet by searching Google for +“employee contacts” +site:gov. This turns up a number of web pages with contacts at various government offices. Attacker settles on a department at XYZ.GOV because not only do they list employee names and email addresses they also list the person's title (many offices still do this). The office also has a Homeland Security role so a successful attack would likely get lots of publicity. The attacker begins by calling a mid-level employee, John, in department YYY saying that he needed to open a trouble ticket for a virus on his computer. John has no idea why this person called his number but promptly gives the person the phone number of the IT Help Desk. Before he hangs up the attack asks John what antivirus he uses and whether he has had any problems before. Attacker then calls the help desk to open a ticket in John's name. While on the phone with the Help Desk the attacker makes friendly and gets this help desk person's name and email address. The attacker now spoofs an email from the Help Desk employee to a few select high level employees at department YYY with the addresses obtained from the web. The email from address is spoofed so that it apparently comes from the Help Desk employee. The email is very convincing as it contains a real name, real phone number for the help desk, even the help desk employee's personal telephone extension. The email also asks recipients to open the attached executable in order to install an antivirus security patch. Of course the attachment is actually a unique backdoor trojan and keylogger. The trojan will not be detectable by the departments antivirus and will install a rootkit that may never be found. After getting login information for the department head the hacker then logs in to several sensitive systems over the course of weeks and makes changes to existing data. The department head's computers are essentially owned by the hacker until they're replaced or completely rebuilt from the ground up.

Scenario 2: (currently being played out)
Motivation: Money
Method: Google harvest / spear phishing attack
Details: Attacker uses an off the shelf email address collection program to harvest email addresses of government employees. These programs are very simple to use and using spidering techniques can collect thousands of targeted email addresses per hour. Attacker uses these addresses to send phishing emails to government employees. The phishing message claims to be from Bank of America (BoA) asking people to update their BoA profile information. The message looks real, is addressed to “Dear Government Employee” and mentions their “government” BoA credit card. Over 1.2 million federal government employees have a BoA credit card and most are use to getting email messages asking them to update their information in some government system or another. Of course once they log in to the system from this email the phishers start running up charges against their government credit card. The Department of Defense specifically addresses this scam in it's spear phishing training that all DoD employees are required to take. But people are still being fooled.

Spear phishing scams are only limited by the attackers imagination. People are just much too likely to be tricked by a phishing email if it contains targeted information familiar to them. We also make it far too easy for attackers by including targeting information on websites. Web pages with information such as a person's email address, job function, title, phone number, mailing address, department name, recent projects they've worked on, client names, etc. are gold mines for the attacker. Employee locators are rich with this type of information and contain lists of thousands of people.

We recently used a government agency employee locator to find an email address of someone in IT security at that office so that we could notify them of a critical vulnerability on their website that was reported to us. When we found an address that said something like we added that as one of the addresses notified. Turned out that address was actually a mailing list. Everyone that had anything to do with IT in that agency received the email! We know because we received hundreds of return receipts. Bad idea to publish that address, in fact mail from the outside shouldn't be allowed to reach such a group (this agency promptly came to the same conclusion). But such an address is perfect spear phishing. Not only does it reach a large targeted audience but the email address even tells you what its used for. Had this been a new unpublished exploit used by an attacker it could have brought that agency down for days and caused immeasurable harm.

  • Training – Though it may not seem as easy as installing a security appliance at the perimeter it is still one of the most effective steps against any social engineering attack. As mentioned above the Department of Defense has mandated it for all DoD employees. Even with all the money and technical know-how they can throw at the problem this was still one of the most important steps.
  • Block inbound message at the perimeter that contain a from address with your own domain (as applicable). Make sure mail from known sources originates from those sources. Eg; If you do a lot of business with a sister organization make sure email from that organization originates from known SMTP servers.
  • Use digital signatures where possible. This is being mandated within DoD and will soon be used throughout the federal government. If an important email is not signed ask the sender to resend it digitally signed. Yes, this can require a large PKI infrastructure but if you are implementing PKI for authentication, HSPD-12, DoD's Common Access Cards (CAC), etc. then by all means start using them within your organization to digitally sign your email. Its the best method for verifying the sender of an email.
  • Use encryption. If only the sender and yourself know the shared secret key then no one else will be able to impersonate one of you to the other. Of course symmetric key encryption (where the key is the same to both encrypt and decrypt a message) becomes very difficult to manage with a large number of people. But its certainly an option. Asymmetric encryption (public / private key) requires the same PKI infrastructure mentioned above or some sort of web of trust to certify the person is who they say they are (see the following description on how the product Pretty Good Privacy (PGP) works).
  • Double up on your current spam defenses. Often times phishing messages originate from compromised computers or botnets. Your anti-spam appliance may have already identified the source as a compromised or rogue SMTP server. Having multiple devices, or services, verifying incoming mail ups the odds of detection.
  • Make sure your users are using either IE7, Firefox 2.0, or Opera 9.1 as those web browsers include some built in protection against known phishing websites. Each of these browsers use technology to compare visited sites against databases of discovered phishing sites. None of these products will offer much protection against true spear phishing since the “narrow net” would probably involve a server that had not yet been discovered. But every layer of protection helps.

  • What is Spear Phishing by Microsoft
  • Spear Phishing by Wikipedia
  • What Is Spear Phishing from Definitions
  • DoD's Spear Phishing Awareness Training – Unclassified PowerPoint but hard to find if you're not part of one of the military Intranets. This link may not work for long so get it while you can, with a little modification it would be great training for any end-user.
  • DoD Information Assurance Awareness – by Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA). Excellent end-user training that can be used by anyone. Takes about 1.5 hours to complete and includes a short test at the end.
  • DoD Battles Spear Phishing – by Federal Computer Week. Real-life spear phishing examples of what the military faces daily. The same techniques can be used against anyone. The argument can be made that every organization or company has something they don't want falling in to the wrong hands.
  • AntiPhishing.Org – A good source of Anti-Phishing information, news, training, whitepapers, and statistics.

Share or Bookmark this Article Using:
No Longer Supported


Posted by on Wednesday 17 January 2007 - 22:05:35 | |printer friendly
Translate to: {GOOGLETRANS}
Google Ads


»CVE-2013-1337 (.net_framework)
Microsoft .NET Framework 4.5 does not properly create policy requirements for custom Windows Communi ...
»CVE-2013-2854 (chrome)
Google Chrome before 27.0.1453.110 on Windows provides an incorrect handle to a renderer process in ...
»CVE-2013-2864 (chrome)
The PDF functionality in Google Chrome before 27.0.1453.110 allows remote attackers to cause a denia ...
»CVE-2013-2867 (chrome, debian_linux)
Google Chrome before 28.0.1500.71 does not properly prevent pop-under windows, which allows remote a ...
»CVE-2013-2868 (chrome, debian_linux)
common/extensions/ in Google Chrome before 28.0.1500.71 proceeds with sync operations ...
»CVE-2013-2869 (chrome, debian_linux)
Google Chrome before 28.0.1500.71 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (out-of-bound ...
»CVE-2013-2870 (chrome, debian_linux)
Use-after-free vulnerability in Google Chrome before 28.0.1500.71 allows remote servers to execute a ...
»CVE-2013-2873 (chrome, debian_linux)
Use-after-free vulnerability in Google Chrome before 28.0.1500.71 allows remote attackers to cause a ...
»CVE-2013-2874 (chrome)
Google Chrome before 28.0.1500.71 on Windows, when an Nvidia GPU is used, allows remote attackers to ...
»CVE-2013-2881 (chrome, debian_linux)
Google Chrome before 28.0.1500.95 does not properly handle frames, which allows remote attackers to ...
»CVE-2013-2882 (chrome, debian_linux, openstack)
Google V8, as used in Google Chrome before 28.0.1500.95, allows remote attackers to cause a denial o ...
»CVE-2013-2883 (chrome, debian_linux)
Use-after-free vulnerability in Google Chrome before 28.0.1500.95 allows remote attackers to cause a ...
»CVE-2013-2884 (chrome, debian_linux)
Use-after-free vulnerability in the DOM implementation in Google Chrome before 28.0.1500.95 allows r ...
»CVE-2013-2885 (chrome, debian_linux)
Use-after-free vulnerability in Google Chrome before 28.0.1500.95 allows remote attackers to cause a ...
»CVE-2013-2886 (chrome, debian_linux)
Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in Google Chrome before 28.0.1500.95 allow attackers to cause a ...

Date published: 2016-10-21T14:00:20Z

»Mozilla Releases Security Update for Firefox
Original release date: October 20, 2016 Mozilla has released Firefox 49.0.2 to address a secu ...
»ISC Releases Security Advisory
Original release date: October 20, 2016 The Internet Systems Consortium (ISC) has released a ...
»Cisco Releases Security Updates
Original release date: October 19, 2016 Cisco has released security updates to address vulner ...
»Oracle Releases Security Bulletin
Original release date: October 18, 2016 Oracle has released its Critical Patch Update for Oct ...
»Week Three of National Cyber Security Awareness Month
Original release date: October 17, 2016 In partnership with DHS, the National Cyber Security ...
»Google Releases Security Update for Chrome
Original release date: October 13, 2016 Google has released Chrome version 54.0.2840.59 to ad ...
»Cisco Releases Security Updates
Original release date: October 12, 2016 Cisco has released security updates to address vulner ...
»Microsoft Releases Security Updates
Original release date: October 11, 2016 Microsoft has released 10 updates to address vulnerab ...
»Adobe Releases Security Updates
Original release date: October 11, 2016 Adobe has released security updates to address vulner ...
»Week Two of National Cyber Security Awareness Month
Original release date: October 11, 2016 October is National Cyber Security Awareness Month, a ...

Date published: not known

»VB2016 paper: The TAO of Automated Iframe Injectors - Building Drive-by Platforms For Fun
We publish Aditya K. Sood's VB2016 paper on the use of iframe injec ...
»“Cybersecurity is, at its core, a people problem,” says VB2016 keynote speaker
An interview with VB2016’s keynote speaker Christine Whalley - Dire ...
»Throwback Thursday: Following the Breadcrumbs
In 1999, Christine Orshesky described how one large organization de ...
»VB2016 preview: Cryptography mistakes in malware
At VB2016, two talks will discuss mistakes made by malware authors ...
»GPS technology is more at risk from cyber attack than ever before, security expert demonstrates at VB2016
Next month at VB2016, HPE Security's Oleg Petrovsky will speak abou ...
»BSides Denver: Join and Support the Security Community
If you are coming to VB2016 in Denver, why not spend an extra day i ...
»VB2016 'Last-Minute' Papers Announced
We are excited to announce the addition of the "last-minute ...
»VB2016 preview: Debugging and Monitoring Malware Network Activities with Haka
In a VB2016 paper, Stormshield researchers Benoit Ancel and Mehdi T ...
»Paper: Behavioural Detection and Prevention of Malware on OS X
In a new paper published through Virus Bulletin, Vincent Van Mieghe ...

Date published: not known
Main Menu
· Home
Current Security News
US-CERT Current Activity

» Mozilla Releases Security Update for Firefox
[20 Oct 2016 08:58pm]

» ISC Releases Security Advisory
[20 Oct 2016 07:20pm]

» Cisco Releases Security Updates
[19 Oct 2016 11:40am]

» Oracle Releases Security Bulletin
[18 Oct 2016 02:23pm]

» Week Three of National Cyber Security Awareness Month
[17 Oct 2016 07:35pm]

» Google Releases Security Update for Chrome
[13 Oct 2016 05:53am]

» Cisco Releases Security Updates
[12 Oct 2016 11:52am]

» Microsoft Releases Security Updates
[11 Oct 2016 02:37pm]

» Adobe Releases Security Updates
[11 Oct 2016 01:40pm]

» Week Two of National Cyber Security Awareness Month
[11 Oct 2016 10:18am]

US-CERT Alerts

» TA16-288A: Heightened DDoS Threat Posed by Mirai and Other Botnets
[14 Oct 2016 05:59pm]

» TA16-250A: The Increasing Threat to Network Infrastructure Devices and Recommended Mitigations
[06 Sep 2016 04:29pm]

» TA16-187A: Symantec and Norton Security Products Contain Critical Vulnerabilities
[05 Jul 2016 08:50am]

» TA16-144A: WPAD Name Collision Vulnerability
[23 May 2016 05:38am]

» TA16-132A: Exploitation of SAP Business Applications
[11 May 2016 05:31am]

» TA16-105A: Apple Ends Support for QuickTime for Windows; New Vulnerabilities Announced
[14 Apr 2016 01:48pm]

» TA16-091A: Ransomware and Recent Variants
[31 Mar 2016 04:00pm]

» TA15-337A: Dorkbot
[03 Dec 2015 04:40pm]

» TA15-314A: Compromised Web Servers and Web Shells - Threat Awareness and Guidance
[10 Nov 2015 06:12pm]

» TA15-286A: Dridex P2P Malware
[13 Oct 2015 05:23am]

Computerworld Security

» 3 ways Windows Server 2016 is tackling security
[21 Oct 2016 04:53am]

» Intel asserts its trademark rights against John McAfee
[21 Oct 2016 04:50am]

» Ex-NSA contractor hoarded 20 years of secrets
[20 Oct 2016 03:42pm]

» Free tool protects PCs from master boot record attacks
[20 Oct 2016 10:05am]

» 5 tools for making sense of system logs
[20 Oct 2016 09:01am]

» IDG Contributor Network: We interrupt this blog to bring you National Cyber Security Awareness Month
[20 Oct 2016 05:00am]

» LinkedIn blames Russian hacking suspect for 2012 breach
[20 Oct 2016 04:59am]

» Yahoo asks U.S. for clarity on email scanning controversy
[19 Oct 2016 02:31pm]

» Flaw in Intel CPUs could help attackers defeat ASLR exploit defense
[19 Oct 2016 12:41pm]

» UK's porn age verification proposal outrages privacy advocates
[19 Oct 2016 12:04pm]

» Politics keeps the U.S. from securing private-sector networks, says former CIA chief Robert Gates
[19 Oct 2016 11:04am]

» Czech police nab Russian hacker suspected of targeting U.S.
[19 Oct 2016 10:49am]

» IDG Contributor Network: Product security: Not just bells and whistles
[19 Oct 2016 10:27am]

» Oracle fixes 100s of vulnerabilities that put enterprise data at risk
[19 Oct 2016 08:38am]

» Tim Cook or Bill Gates as Clinton's VP? It was considered
[19 Oct 2016 05:00am]

Microsoft Security Advisories

» 3181759 - Vulnerabilities in ASP.NET Core View Components Could Allow Elevation of Privilege - Version: 1.0
[13 Sep 2016 11:00am]

» 3174644 - Updated Support for Diffie-Hellman Key Exchange - Version: 1.0
[13 Sep 2016 11:00am]

» 3179528 - Update for Kernel Mode Blacklist - Version: 1.0
[09 Aug 2016 11:00am]

» 2880823 - Deprecation of SHA-1 Hashing Algorithm for Microsoft Root Certificate Program - Version: 2.0
[18 May 2016 11:00am]

» 3155527 - Update to Cipher Suites for FalseStart - Version: 1.0
[10 May 2016 11:00am]

» 3152550 - Update to Improve Wireless Mouse Input Filtering - Version: 1.1
[22 Apr 2016 11:00am]

» 3137909 - Vulnerabilities in ASP.NET Templates Could Allow Tampering - Version: 1.1
[10 Feb 2016 11:00am]

» 2871997 - Update to Improve Credentials Protection and Management - Version: 5.0
[09 Feb 2016 11:00am]

» 3123479 - Deprecation of SHA-1 Hashing Algorithm for Microsoft Root Certificate Program - Version: 1.0
[12 Jan 2016 11:00am]

» 3109853 - Update to Improve TLS Session Resumption Interoperability - Version: 1.0
[12 Jan 2016 11:00am]

» 3118753 - Updates for ActiveX Kill Bits 3118753 - Version: 1.0
[12 Jan 2016 11:00am]

» 2755801 - Update for Vulnerabilities in Adobe Flash Player in Internet Explorer and Microsoft Edge - Version: 53.0
[05 Jan 2016 11:00am]

» 3057154 - Update to Harden Use of DES Encryption - Version: 1.1
[08 Dec 2015 11:00am]

» 3123040 - Inadvertently Disclosed Digital Certificate Could Allow Spoofing - Version: 1.0
[08 Dec 2015 11:00am]

» 3119884 - Inadvertently Disclosed Digital Certificates Could Allow Spoofing - Version: 1.0
[30 Nov 2015 11:00am]


» Anonymous’ Most Notorious Hacker Is Back, and He’s Gone Legit
[21 Oct 2016 05:00am]

» Imagine if Donald Trump Controlled the NSA
[19 Oct 2016 05:00am]

» Cops Have a Database of 117M Faces. You’re Probably in It
[18 Oct 2016 12:19pm]

» Security News This Week: Hackers Hit a Nuclear Plant
[14 Oct 2016 04:15pm]

» Want to Know Julian Assange’s Endgame? He Told You a Decade Ago
[14 Oct 2016 06:34am]

» Some Basic Security Tips for the Clinton Campaign (and Anyone Else)
[13 Oct 2016 03:01pm]

» Akamai Finds Longtime Security Flaw in 2 Million Devices
[13 Oct 2016 01:34pm]

» Obama’s Concerned an AI Could Hack America’s Nukes
[12 Oct 2016 04:55am]

» Signal, the Cypherpunk App of Choice, Adds Disappearing Messages
[11 Oct 2016 02:23pm]

» Security News This Week: Verizon Reportedly Wants a $1 Billion Discount on the Yahoo Deal
[08 Oct 2016 07:53am]

Network World Security

» DNS provider Dyn gets DDoSed, takes out Twitter, GitHub and plenty others
[21 Oct 2016 08:03am]

» IDG Contributor Network: 7 steps to proactive security
[21 Oct 2016 05:00am]

» Intel asserts its trademark rights against John McAfee
[21 Oct 2016 12:56am]

» Ex-NSA contractor hoarded two decades' worth of secrets
[20 Oct 2016 03:42pm]

» Roqos Core router combines cybersecurity with parental controls
[18 Oct 2016 07:01am]

» 5 tools for making sense of system logs
[17 Oct 2016 07:33am]

» Check Point SandBlast takes endpoint protection to another level
[17 Oct 2016 03:59am]

» Open source routers deliver low cost, flexibility
[12 Sep 2016 04:00am]

» Review: 5 open source alternatives for routers/firewalls
[12 Sep 2016 04:00am]

» Review: SentinelOne blocks and dissects threats
[31 Aug 2016 05:40am]

» Review: Top tools for preventing data leaks
[29 Aug 2016 04:00am]

» Top tools for preventing data leaks
[29 Aug 2016 04:00am]

» Review: Promisec goes the extra step to secure PCs
[13 Jul 2016 06:21am]

» Intel asserts its trademark rights against John McAfee
[21 Oct 2016 12:56am]

» Ex-NSA contractor hoarded two decades' worth of secrets
[20 Oct 2016 03:42pm]


More IT Security
News Feeds
More Sponsors

Advertise on this site
RSS Feeds
Our news can be syndicated by using these rss feeds.
rdf is in no way connected to the U.S. government site

This site is © John Herron, CISSP. All Rights Reserved.

Please visit daily to stay up to date on all your IT Security compliance issues. -
Hosted by BlueHost. We've never had a better hosting company.