NIST Site Search
Search NIST.GOV
Custom Search
[Official NIST.GOV TIME]
Product Research

Advertise on this site
Spear Phishing – Casting a Narrow Net
If you haven't heard of the term “Spear Phishing” you probably don't work for the Department of Defense (DoD). All DoD employees and contractors (Army, Navy, Air Force, Marines, etc.) are now required to complete spear phishing training. What is it and why should you care?No Longer Supported
Spear Phishing is simply as the title of this article indicates, it is the same as phishing but focused on a much smaller audience. A small net to catch just a few, or one, big fish. Often the attack is tailored to a particular individual, office or company. The bait is customized with information familiar, and specific, to the target. Often the attack takes on characteristics of a traditional con. The attacker uses information about you or your company to lower your guard and defeat any skepticism you may have that the email you just received is a scam. The information may be easily obtainable from the Internet, a phone book, or perhaps from a call to the office secretary. Social engineering is often a part of a good spear phishing attack. There is also some sort of bait to convince you that the message isn't just legitimate spam (because even if the sender of the email knows you that doesn't mean you want to open their email).

An attacker may use jargon used by the individual's business or line of work. They may express familiarity with other people within the company and mention them by name. Sometimes they'll reference procedures or forms used by the targets agency. Each of us may think we would never fall for this, but think of the people you work with. Given a personally addressed email that referenced a company specific product or service how many would open an attached file? Especially a MS Word or Excel file (both of which have had exploits recently that can be used to compromise a computer). Probably a large percentage of your coworkers would fall for this.

The goal of a spear phishing attack is often to obtain very specific information. It could be financial information, insider contract information, passwords, sensitive employee data, etc. (Studies show that a large percentage of users are still all too willing to give out their password to someone they don' know that claims to work for the IT department.) If they still fall for that they'll fall for most anything. (See References and Recommendations below)

Scenario 1:
Motivation: Wreak Havoc at a government office
Method: Combined social engineering / spear phishing attack
Details: Attacker finds an employee contact page on the Internet by searching Google for +“employee contacts” +site:gov. This turns up a number of web pages with contacts at various government offices. Attacker settles on a department at XYZ.GOV because not only do they list employee names and email addresses they also list the person's title (many offices still do this). The office also has a Homeland Security role so a successful attack would likely get lots of publicity. The attacker begins by calling a mid-level employee, John, in department YYY saying that he needed to open a trouble ticket for a virus on his computer. John has no idea why this person called his number but promptly gives the person the phone number of the IT Help Desk. Before he hangs up the attack asks John what antivirus he uses and whether he has had any problems before. Attacker then calls the help desk to open a ticket in John's name. While on the phone with the Help Desk the attacker makes friendly and gets this help desk person's name and email address. The attacker now spoofs an email from the Help Desk employee to a few select high level employees at department YYY with the addresses obtained from the web. The email from address is spoofed so that it apparently comes from the Help Desk employee. The email is very convincing as it contains a real name, real phone number for the help desk, even the help desk employee's personal telephone extension. The email also asks recipients to open the attached executable in order to install an antivirus security patch. Of course the attachment is actually a unique backdoor trojan and keylogger. The trojan will not be detectable by the departments antivirus and will install a rootkit that may never be found. After getting login information for the department head the hacker then logs in to several sensitive systems over the course of weeks and makes changes to existing data. The department head's computers are essentially owned by the hacker until they're replaced or completely rebuilt from the ground up.

Scenario 2: (currently being played out)
Motivation: Money
Method: Google harvest / spear phishing attack
Details: Attacker uses an off the shelf email address collection program to harvest email addresses of government employees. These programs are very simple to use and using spidering techniques can collect thousands of targeted email addresses per hour. Attacker uses these addresses to send phishing emails to government employees. The phishing message claims to be from Bank of America (BoA) asking people to update their BoA profile information. The message looks real, is addressed to “Dear Government Employee” and mentions their “government” BoA credit card. Over 1.2 million federal government employees have a BoA credit card and most are use to getting email messages asking them to update their information in some government system or another. Of course once they log in to the system from this email the phishers start running up charges against their government credit card. The Department of Defense specifically addresses this scam in it's spear phishing training that all DoD employees are required to take. But people are still being fooled.

Spear phishing scams are only limited by the attackers imagination. People are just much too likely to be tricked by a phishing email if it contains targeted information familiar to them. We also make it far too easy for attackers by including targeting information on websites. Web pages with information such as a person's email address, job function, title, phone number, mailing address, department name, recent projects they've worked on, client names, etc. are gold mines for the attacker. Employee locators are rich with this type of information and contain lists of thousands of people.

We recently used a government agency employee locator to find an email address of someone in IT security at that office so that we could notify them of a critical vulnerability on their website that was reported to us. When we found an address that said something like cybersecurity@domain.gov we added that as one of the addresses notified. Turned out that address was actually a mailing list. Everyone that had anything to do with IT in that agency received the email! We know because we received hundreds of return receipts. Bad idea to publish that address, in fact mail from the outside shouldn't be allowed to reach such a group (this agency promptly came to the same conclusion). But such an address is perfect spear phishing. Not only does it reach a large targeted audience but the email address even tells you what its used for. Had this been a new unpublished exploit used by an attacker it could have brought that agency down for days and caused immeasurable harm.

Recommendations:
  • Training – Though it may not seem as easy as installing a security appliance at the perimeter it is still one of the most effective steps against any social engineering attack. As mentioned above the Department of Defense has mandated it for all DoD employees. Even with all the money and technical know-how they can throw at the problem this was still one of the most important steps.
  • Block inbound message at the perimeter that contain a from address with your own domain (as applicable). Make sure mail from known sources originates from those sources. Eg; If you do a lot of business with a sister organization make sure email from that organization originates from known SMTP servers.
  • Use digital signatures where possible. This is being mandated within DoD and will soon be used throughout the federal government. If an important email is not signed ask the sender to resend it digitally signed. Yes, this can require a large PKI infrastructure but if you are implementing PKI for authentication, HSPD-12, DoD's Common Access Cards (CAC), etc. then by all means start using them within your organization to digitally sign your email. Its the best method for verifying the sender of an email.
  • Use encryption. If only the sender and yourself know the shared secret key then no one else will be able to impersonate one of you to the other. Of course symmetric key encryption (where the key is the same to both encrypt and decrypt a message) becomes very difficult to manage with a large number of people. But its certainly an option. Asymmetric encryption (public / private key) requires the same PKI infrastructure mentioned above or some sort of web of trust to certify the person is who they say they are (see the following description on how the product Pretty Good Privacy (PGP) works).
  • Double up on your current spam defenses. Often times phishing messages originate from compromised computers or botnets. Your anti-spam appliance may have already identified the source as a compromised or rogue SMTP server. Having multiple devices, or services, verifying incoming mail ups the odds of detection.
  • Make sure your users are using either IE7, Firefox 2.0, or Opera 9.1 as those web browsers include some built in protection against known phishing websites. Each of these browsers use technology to compare visited sites against databases of discovered phishing sites. None of these products will offer much protection against true spear phishing since the “narrow net” would probably involve a server that had not yet been discovered. But every layer of protection helps.


References:
  • What is Spear Phishing by Microsoft
  • Spear Phishing by Wikipedia
  • What Is Spear Phishing from SearchSecurity.com Definitions
  • DoD's Spear Phishing Awareness Training – Unclassified PowerPoint but hard to find if you're not part of one of the military Intranets. This link may not work for long so get it while you can, with a little modification it would be great training for any end-user.
  • DoD Information Assurance Awareness – by Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA). Excellent end-user training that can be used by anyone. Takes about 1.5 hours to complete and includes a short test at the end.
  • DoD Battles Spear Phishing – by Federal Computer Week. Real-life spear phishing examples of what the military faces daily. The same techniques can be used against anyone. The argument can be made that every organization or company has something they don't want falling in to the wrong hands.
  • AntiPhishing.Org – A good source of Anti-Phishing information, news, training, whitepapers, and statistics.


Share or Bookmark this Article Using:
No Longer Supported




Google
WebNIST.org
NIST.govSecurityFocus.com





Posted by NIST.org on Wednesday 17 January 2007 - 22:05:35 | |printer friendly
Translate to: {GOOGLETRANS}
Google Ads




Headlines

»CVE-2014-9862 (mac_os_x)
Integer signedness error in bspatch.c in bspatch in bsdiff, as used in Apple OS X before 10.11.6 and ...
»CVE-2015-5738
The RSA-CRT implementation in the Cavium Software Development Kit (SDK) 2.x, when used on OCTEON II ...
»CVE-2015-8946 (ecryptfs-utils, ubuntu_linux)
ecryptfs-setup-swap in eCryptfs before 111 does not prevent the unencrypted swap partition from acti ...
»CVE-2016-0635 (documaker, enterprise_manager_ops_center, health_sciences_information_manager, healthcare_master_person_index, insurance_calculation_engine, insurance_policy_administration_j2ee, insurance_rules_palette, primavera_contract_management, primavera_p6_enterprise_project_portfolio_management, retail_integration_bus, retail_order_broker_cloud_service)
Unspecified vulnerability in the Enterprise Manager Ops Center component in Oracle Enterprise Manage ...
»CVE-2016-1374 (unified_computing_system_performance_manager)
The web framework in Cisco Unified Computing System (UCS) Performance Manager 2.0.0 and earlier allo ...
»CVE-2016-1460 (wireless_lan_controller_software)
Cisco Wireless LAN Controller (WLC) devices 7.4(121.0) and 8.0(0.30220.385) allow remote attackers t ...
»CVE-2016-1462 (prime_service_catalog)
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the web-based management interface in Cisco Prime Servic ...
»CVE-2016-1463 (firesight_system_software)
Cisco FireSIGHT System Software 5.3.0, 5.3.1, 5.4.0, 6.0, and 6.0.1 allows remote attackers to bypas ...
»CVE-2016-1465 (nx-os)
Cisco Nexus 1000v Application Virtual Switch (AVS) devices before 5.2(1)SV3(1.5i) allow remote attac ...
»CVE-2016-1467 (videoscape_session_resource_manager)
Cisco Videoscape Session Resource Manager (VSRM) allows remote attackers to cause a denial of servic ...
»CVE-2016-1705 (chrome)
Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in Google Chrome before 52.0.2743.82 allow attackers to cause a ...
»CVE-2016-1706 (chrome)
The PPAPI implementation in Google Chrome before 52.0.2743.82 does not validate the origin of IPC me ...
»CVE-2016-1707 (chrome)
ios/web/web_state/ui/crw_web_controller.mm in Google Chrome before 52.0.2743.82 on iOS does not ensu ...
»CVE-2016-1708 (chrome)
The Chrome Web Store inline-installation implementation in the Extensions subsystem in Google Chrome ...
»CVE-2016-1709 (chrome, sfntly)
Heap-based buffer overflow in the ByteArray::Get method in data/byte_array.cc in Google sfntly befor ...


Date published: 2016-07-29T04:50:05Z
Details

»Google Releases Security Update for Chrome
Original release date: July 21, 2016 Google has released Chrome version 52.0.2743.82 to addre ...
»Cisco Releases Security Update
Original release date: July 20, 2016 | Last revised: July 25, 2016 Cisco has released a secur ...
»Oracle Releases Security Bulletin
Original release date: July 19, 2016 Oracle has released its Critical Patch Update for July 2016 to address 276 vulnerabilities across multiple products. Exploitation of some of these vulnerabilities may allow a remote attacker to take control of an affected system.US-CERT encourages users and administrators to review the Oracle July 2016 Critical Patch Update and apply the necessary updates. This product is provided subject to this Notification and this Privacy & Use policy.
»Drupal Releases Security Advisory
Original release date: July 18, 2016 Drupal has released an advisory to address a vulnerabili ...
»Apple Releases Multiple Security Updates
Original release date: July 18, 2016 Apple has released security updates for iTunes, Safari, ...
»Cisco Releases Security Updates
Original release date: July 14, 2016 Cisco has released security updates to address vulnerabi ...
»Microsoft Releases Security Updates
Original release date: July 12, 2016 Microsoft has released 11 updates to address vulnerabili ...
»Adobe Releases Security Updates
Original release date: July 12, 2016 Adobe has released security updates to address vulnerabi ...
»Cisco Releases Security Updates
Original release date: June 30, 2016 Cisco has released security updates to address vulnerabi ...
»Symantec Releases Security Updates
Original release date: June 29, 2016 Symantec has released security updates to address vulner ...


Date published: not known
Details

»Guest Blog: Malicious Scripts Gaining Prevalence in Brazil
In the run up to VB2016, we invited the conference sponsors to writ ...
»Romanian university website compromised to serve Neutrino exploit kit
The website of the Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy ...
»It's 2016. Can we stop using MD5 in malware analyses?
While there are no actually risks involved in using MD5s in malware ...
»Throwback Thursday: Holding the Bady
In 2001, ‘Code Red’ caused White House administrators to change the ...
»Paper: The Journey of Evasion Enters Behavioural Phase
A new paper by FireEye researcher Ankit Anubhav provides an overvie ...
»Guest blog: Espionage toolkit uncovered targeting Central and Eastern Europe
Recently, ESET researchers uncovered a new espionage toolkit target ...
»Avast acquires AVG for $1.3bn
Anti-virus vendor Avast has announced the acquisition of its rival ...
»Throwback Thursday: You Are the Weakest Link, Goodbye!
Passwords have long been a weak point in the security chain, despit ...
»Paper: New Keylogger on the Block
In a new paper published by Virus Bulletin, Sophos researcher Gabor ...


Date published: not known
Details
Main Menu
· Home
Current Security News
 
US-CERT Current Activity

» Google Releases Security Update for Chrome
[21 Jul 2016 11:27am]

» Cisco Releases Security Update
[20 Jul 2016 10:29am]

» Oracle Releases Security Bulletin
[19 Jul 2016 04:07pm]

» Drupal Releases Security Advisory
[18 Jul 2016 03:23pm]

» Apple Releases Multiple Security Updates
[18 Jul 2016 03:13pm]

» Cisco Releases Security Updates
[14 Jul 2016 07:09am]

» Microsoft Releases Security Updates
[12 Jul 2016 05:06pm]

» Adobe Releases Security Updates
[12 Jul 2016 10:55am]

» Cisco Releases Security Updates
[30 Jun 2016 05:35am]

» Symantec Releases Security Updates
[29 Jun 2016 09:40am]

***
US-CERT Alerts

» TA16-187A: Symantec and Norton Security Products Contain Critical Vulnerabilities
[05 Jul 2016 08:50am]

» TA16-144A: WPAD Name Collision Vulnerability
[23 May 2016 05:38am]

» TA16-132A: Exploitation of SAP Business Applications
[11 May 2016 05:31am]

» TA16-105A: Apple Ends Support for QuickTime for Windows; New Vulnerabilities Announced
[14 Apr 2016 01:48pm]

» TA16-091A: Ransomware and Recent Variants
[31 Mar 2016 04:00pm]

» TA15-337A: Dorkbot
[03 Dec 2015 04:40pm]

» TA15-314A: Compromised Web Servers and Web Shells - Threat Awareness and Guidance
[10 Nov 2015 06:12pm]

» TA15-286A: Dridex P2P Malware
[13 Oct 2015 05:23am]

» TA15-240A: Controlling Outbound DNS Access
[28 Aug 2015 11:31am]

» TA15-213A: Recent Email Phishing Campaigns – Mitigation and Response Recommendations
[01 Aug 2015 04:01pm]

***
Computerworld Security

» Whistleblower Edward Snowden questions WikiLeaks' methods
[29 Jul 2016 04:51am]

» FBI probing possible hack of another Democratic Party organization
[28 Jul 2016 08:02pm]

» Trump's hacking comments rattle cybersecurity pros
[28 Jul 2016 05:28pm]

» The AdGholas malvertising campaign infected thousands of computers per day
[28 Jul 2016 12:51pm]

» Google beefs up Linux kernel defenses in Android
[28 Jul 2016 12:21pm]

» Security Sessions: Generational differences in security, privacy attitudes
[28 Jul 2016 06:00am]

» Microsoft mandates Windows 10 hardware change for PC security
[27 Jul 2016 03:33pm]

» Flaw with password manager LastPass could hand over control to hackers
[27 Jul 2016 02:22pm]

» Trump to Russian hackers: Help find Hillary Clinton's emails
[27 Jul 2016 12:30pm]

» Rival gang leaks decryption keys for Chimera ransomware
[27 Jul 2016 11:52am]

» 7 strategies to avoid CSO burnout
[27 Jul 2016 09:29am]

» KeySniffer: Hackers can snag wireless keyboard keystrokes from 250 feet away
[27 Jul 2016 07:31am]

» Surefire security fail: One. App. At. A. Time.
[27 Jul 2016 05:00am]

» FBI to lead nation's cyberattack responses
[26 Jul 2016 02:21pm]

» SMS-based two-factor authentication may be headed out the door
[26 Jul 2016 01:26pm]

***
Microsoft Security Advisories

» 2880823 - Deprecation of SHA-1 Hashing Algorithm for Microsoft Root Certificate Program - Version: 2.0
[18 May 2016 11:00am]

» 3155527 - Update to Cipher Suites for FalseStart - Version: 1.0
[10 May 2016 11:00am]

» 3152550 - Update to Improve Wireless Mouse Input Filtering - Version: 1.1
[22 Apr 2016 11:00am]

» 3137909 - Vulnerabilities in ASP.NET Templates Could Allow Tampering - Version: 1.1
[10 Feb 2016 11:00am]

» 2871997 - Update to Improve Credentials Protection and Management - Version: 5.0
[09 Feb 2016 11:00am]

» 3123479 - Deprecation of SHA-1 Hashing Algorithm for Microsoft Root Certificate Program - Version: 1.0
[12 Jan 2016 11:00am]

» 3109853 - Update to Improve TLS Session Resumption Interoperability - Version: 1.0
[12 Jan 2016 11:00am]

» 3118753 - Updates for ActiveX Kill Bits 3118753 - Version: 1.0
[12 Jan 2016 11:00am]

» 2755801 - Update for Vulnerabilities in Adobe Flash Player in Internet Explorer and Microsoft Edge - Version: 53.0
[05 Jan 2016 11:00am]

» 3057154 - Update to Harden Use of DES Encryption - Version: 1.1
[08 Dec 2015 11:00am]

» 3123040 - Inadvertently Disclosed Digital Certificate Could Allow Spoofing - Version: 1.0
[08 Dec 2015 11:00am]

» 3119884 - Inadvertently Disclosed Digital Certificates Could Allow Spoofing - Version: 1.0
[30 Nov 2015 11:00am]

» 3108638 - Update for Windows Hyper-V to Address CPU Weakness - Version: 1.0
[10 Nov 2015 11:00am]

» 3097966 - Inadvertently Disclosed Digital Certificates Could Allow Spoofing - Version: 2.0
[13 Oct 2015 11:00am]

» 2960358 - Update for Disabling RC4 in .NET TLS - Version: 2.0
[13 Oct 2015 11:00am]

***
WIRED

» How To Fool AI Into Seeing Something That Isn’t There
[29 Jul 2016 08:56am]

» Trump Asks Russia to Dig Up Hillary’s Emails in Unprecedented Remarks
[27 Jul 2016 11:49am]

» Here’s What We Know About Russia and the DNC Hack
[27 Jul 2016 07:30am]

» WikiLeaks Has Officially Lost the Moral High Ground
[27 Jul 2016 06:00am]

» Radio Hack Steals Keystrokes from Millions of Wireless Keyboards
[26 Jul 2016 07:30am]

» 11 Police Robots Patrolling Around the World
[24 Jul 2016 05:00am]

» The KickassTorrents Case Could Be Huge
[22 Jul 2016 07:00am]

» How the Republican Convention Fends Off Hackers
[21 Jul 2016 07:55am]

» Snowden Designs a Device to Warn if Your iPhone’s Radios Are Snitching
[21 Jul 2016 07:01am]

» How the RNC Would Handle a Worst-Case Scenario Like a Bio or Chemical Attack
[21 Jul 2016 05:00am]

***
Network World Security

» IDG Contributor Network: Attack attribution does little to improve enterprise security
[29 Jul 2016 07:27am]

» There are mobile and IoT companion documents for the CIS (Top 20) Critical Security Controls
[29 Jul 2016 07:09am]

» WikiLeaks' methods questioned by whistleblower Edward Snowden
[28 Jul 2016 11:31pm]

» FBI said to investigate possible hack of another Democratic Party organization
[28 Jul 2016 08:02pm]

» Review: Promisec goes the extra step to secure PCs
[13 Jul 2016 06:21am]

» 4 tools for managing firewall rules
[07 Jul 2016 11:03am]

» 10 advanced endpoint protection tools
[05 Jul 2016 04:00am]

» How to buy endpoint security products
[05 Jul 2016 04:00am]

» 7 trends in advanced endpoint protection
[05 Jul 2016 04:00am]

» 10 cutting-edge tools that take endpoint security to a new level
[05 Jul 2016 04:00am]

» Buyer’s Guide to 9 multi-factor authentication products
[06 Jun 2016 04:00am]

» 5 trends shaking up multi-factor authentication
[06 Jun 2016 04:00am]

» 9-vendor authentication roundup: The good, the bad and the ugly
[06 Jun 2016 04:00am]

» WikiLeaks' methods questioned by whistleblower Edward Snowden
[28 Jul 2016 11:31pm]

» FBI said to investigate possible hack of another Democratic Party organization
[28 Jul 2016 08:02pm]

***


More IT Security
News Feeds
More Sponsors

Advertise on this site
RSS Feeds
Our news can be syndicated by using these rss feeds.
rss1.0
rss2.0
rdf

NIST.org is in no way connected to the U.S. government site NIST.gov

This site is © John Herron, CISSP. All Rights Reserved.

Please visit daily to stay up to date on all your IT Security compliance issues.

http://www.nist.org -
Hosted by BlueHost. We've never had a better hosting company.
{THEMEDISCLAIMER}